I'd like to raise a rather important suggestion:
Now that HPD is becoming harder to get, AP is being somewhat limited, hardware is becoming harder to earn, and research is getting diminishing returns,
I think it's time to start thinking *again* about shared servers, the major bonuses being in research.
I think that it will encourage teamplay, and help research along.
now, if research is SUPPOSED to be slower and more tedious now (which could be a good idea!), then by all means, please ignore the statement and tell me.
Now, if it's not supposed to be TO hard to research, I think shared servers would do well to help it move along, and for once, (heheh) we could 'group research' something effectively, which would be a great incentive to be in a group.
I think it could work like this:
A is in a group with B and C.
A offers a shared server with B.
B gets a message saying something along the lines of:
'A has proposed a Shared Server, for X (HPD) you can accept'
B hits the conveniently placed 'accept' button at the end of the letter and pays X (increasing server costs now, so it's not 10k. :D )
they both pay 50-55% of the price (yes, up to 110% of the orginal price, if for some reason that needs be.)
Then, since C is also in the group, B invites him, he pays 50-55% (or w/e) and joins.
[Now, with 3 people sinking money into ONE server, you need restrictions, I suggest that hardware costs slightly more to buy for anyone part of the server, or research could cost more or something]
A decides to leave the group, and so, clicks 'abandon ownership'
now, B and C run it.
Extras: Localhosts could be distincted as
idea1: LocalHost: person who proposed server
Admin1Localhost1: Accepted the server
Admin2/Localhost2: third owner
etc. etc.
idea2: For each person with ownership, prices could be increased by a certain percentage: ?%
Idea3: groups of 3 or more could choose to vote off a disruptive member.
what do you think?