|
Title: Pause Task? Post by: asdfth12 on July 16, 2011, 05:09:18 PM Basicly you need resources for something else. But, you don't want to end a task that is currently in progress.
Why not pause that task? When paused it could use something like 50-75% less resources and remain at whatever time it was at when paused until resumed. Title: Re: Pause Task? Post by: Hatejacket on July 16, 2011, 07:32:25 PM Basicly you need resources for something else. But, you don't want to end a task that is currently in progress. Why not pause that task? When paused it could use something like 50-75% less resources and remain at whatever time it was at when paused until resumed. I'm not too keen on this idea. I can't exactly put my finger on why, but it just seems like a loophole could be too easily made from it, or it won't promote newer users to go out and do missions (if they can manage with the hardware they have) Title: Re: Pause Task? Post by: tn5421 on August 19, 2011, 05:20:25 PM This could be good if it forces the task version to decay once every 72/168hours or so. There has to be a negative or people will abuse for virii.
|