|
228
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: IP Database
|
on: June 28, 2008, 02:05:57 PM
|
|
uh huh.. back to the topic at hand...
yes, it has been requested before, but hell.
i can only think of two ways to organise:
by name by ip
my suggestion was to add a *last* option
to be honest, i would prefer a search function, but one step at a time
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Small modification for a more noob-friendly environment
|
on: June 28, 2008, 01:36:44 PM
|
|
Now, the current problem is that ANYONE at the very beginning can break into anyone else's computer.
0.1 attack >0.1 defence.
This leads to severe frustration as some peopel just want to be mean and delete/kill all processes, even if their targets in question were simply dling improved defences.
MY suggestion was originally: make it like hiding files. 0.1 defence > 0.1 attack. However, this would have lead to severe wierdness about the servers.
Therefore, im wondering if it is too much to ask for beginners to start with a 0.101 (or something perhaps a 0.106) password/firewall protect. Or in fact, just start with a beginning firewall/pass word protect that is higher than the beginning firewall/password breaker.
I know this does not address the uber-strong hackers from still wrecking carnage, but one step at a time? =/
thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
HP Info Terminal / F.A.Q. / data hijack
|
on: June 28, 2008, 08:33:50 AM
|
|
IT says in teh manual:
Since the file is intercepted directly from the router and the communications are encrypted, the file will also be encrypted with a version equal to the intercepted software version
i interpret this as:
player Y has intercepted player X's file, version 0.25. player Y therefore needs a decryptor valued at 0.25 or above inorder to use this file.
Am i correct? or does the program file have to be encrypted in the first place for the decryption part to take hold?
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / ability to simultaneously crack passwords
|
on: June 28, 2008, 08:10:12 AM
|
|
minor suggestion here.
atm i like the idea of having load levels, (i.e, running password at double if you have the system resources)
however, i would like the option to crack two-passwords , if not more, simultaneously rather than having to do it one at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: Groups, Sites (maybe)
|
on: June 27, 2008, 07:53:26 PM
|
|
He's not talking about the gold ftp server. they are useless to clans as only the account holder can access it.
he means buying a new server entirely. plant defences, use it as a means ot transferring stuff.
not cheap at 20k though.
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
HP Info Terminal / F.A.Q. / Re: Hardware Questions
|
on: June 27, 2008, 03:24:56 PM
|
|
it will allow you to upload and download faster, but it also depends on where you are uploadingto/downloading from.
i'll leave this one to the admin and i'm slightly confused about this myself.
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
HP Info Terminal / News & Updates / Re: Format HDD
|
on: June 27, 2008, 11:45:06 AM
|
|
things which deter hackers:
large co-operations. Lots of logs to sift through
gateways with active defences. takes time, and if you plant modified logs, they might take the bait.
a bounce trail which goes in a loop.
(A big scary warning message saying follow at your peril or something similar xD)
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
HP Info Terminal / News & Updates / Re: Format HDD
|
on: June 27, 2008, 10:49:10 AM
|
If I delete my logs using the 0.1 log undeleter, won't they just be recovered by some more advanced hacker? Seems pointless to even try. I can just hope that nobody cares enough to follow my bouncing trail.
Does formatting the HDD purge logs (maybe permanently)?
You could change your the logs instead of just delete them. Nobody tries to recover a log which isnt deleted. Just please dont hack me with this strategy. I do. ALready traced dozens of people in this game, an un-deleted log is not above my scrutiny.
|
|
|
|
|