To make HJ happy:
Suggestion: A new program type that masks the name/type of a running process
Description: With this new program, people would be able to mask a process, so instead of giving a name/file type, it would read something like "Unknown Process." Actual programs like this do exist. The cpu/mem/hdd/BW would still be displayed. Depending on the following discussion, this could/could not lock the process from being killed (I assume people will veto this because of the power/potential abuse issues). If the process isn't locked, I propose that the version doesn't cap according to level, since it causes no harm. If it DOES lock the process, it should be tied to file version - that way low players only need a low unmasker, while high players would need to research accordingly. See? Balance.
Players most positively affected by this update (Virii Infectors, Newbies, Etc):
Infectors/disinfectors/anyone who runs processes on a remote gateway
List THREE reasons why these types of players would be positively affected by this update:
1: Infectors could mask their virii, making it more difficult to disinfect
2: Disinfectors could mask their processes, potentially fooling infectors from hunting them
3: Anyone downloading/uploading/deleting could ask mask the process to avoid suspicion
Players most negatively affected by this update (Virii Infectors, Newbies, Etc):
Passive players, those who are too broke to research another file
List THREE reasons why these types of players would be negatively affected by this update:
1: Very casual players might be put-off by the fact that they can't instantly see all processes
2: These same players might not want to take the time to get another file-type
3: If players are very poor, another research might not be possible. Easily fixable by generous players
List as many reasons you can as to why this suggestion should be implemented (Minimum of 2):
1: Gives the game more of a real "hackerish" feel
2: Allows players to feel more sneaky-like
3: Generally awesome
List as many reasons you can as to why this suggestion should NOT be implemented:
1: You would have to code it. Sorry!