|
ãłþħά-∆9
|
 |
« on: April 07, 2010, 12:48:01 PM » |
|
Can we get abilities in Firewall + Password Protect?
I don't see why they're not there anyway considering the breakers are, and some mostly useless ones like process tracer...
That will be all ^^
Yes, I make alot of suggestions, and what?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Exousia
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2010, 03:29:31 PM » |
|
And/or the ability to overload them would be nice too.... (shameless reference to other suggestions)....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brok Ironfist
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2010, 05:59:49 PM » |
|
  I agree totally. Overload abilities needed on all software... Hey if we got the hardware allow us to overload. Oh, and overloading should cost much more than an equivalent version... Overload 1 --> 5 should cost something like a level 10 version. So using that math all overloaded software should cost 2x the regular version.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bontrose
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2010, 03:39:53 PM » |
|
+1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i win
you lose
get over it
NOW
|
|
|
|
sukilove
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2010, 07:46:41 AM » |
|
Overload + Cost a little income and a bit increase of Ap so it's balance out~
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brok Ironfist
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2010, 08:45:44 AM » |
|
It should just cost extra resources. AP and Income would be just weird.
A Level overloaded to a level 10 should use the resources of a level 20.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bontrose
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2010, 07:36:04 PM » |
|
A Level overloaded to a level 10 should use the resources of a level 20.
a lv what? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i win
you lose
get over it
NOW
|
|
|
|
Brok Ironfist
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2010, 09:02:19 PM » |
|
A Level overloaded to a level 10 should use the resources of a level 20.
a lv what? Sorry, software version. Right now when you overload a Password Breaker (for example) it costs equal to or less than the equivalent overloaded file. So a Password Break 1 overloaded to a 10 costs the same amount of resources (i.e. memory and CPU) as a standard version 10. I would recommend that the Overloaded version take up much more of the resources than the version it is being overloaded to. Make sense? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ãłþħά-∆9
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2010, 02:48:57 AM » |
|
Hm I was under the impression it cost alot more, but upon checking i guess not.
Red Hammer 43.3023 86605 5412788 - Overloaded from v24 (iassume)
Red Hammer 40.8548 Not enough CPU! Need 81709.6 mhz. - Not overloaded (and 3 versions smaller)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 11:51:16 AM by Alpha-9 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hatejacket
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2010, 03:09:40 AM » |
|
When did this change? I was under the assumption that it was 33% more.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brok Ironfist
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2010, 06:49:20 AM » |
|
It has been that way since at least the beginning of last round.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hatejacket
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2010, 07:40:53 AM » |
|
That's silly. It's called overloading for a reason.....What's the point in researching a breaker too high?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 08:00:32 AM by Hatejacket »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brok Ironfist
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2010, 10:52:32 AM » |
|
That's silly. It's called overloading for a reason.....What's the point in researching a breaker too high?
Just to say you did. Or the hope that someday Overloading will be reduced. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bontrose
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 22, 2010, 11:29:47 AM » |
|
or power
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i win
you lose
get over it
NOW
|
|
|
|
ãłþħά-∆9
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 22, 2010, 11:51:43 AM » |
|
Bontrose took the words right out of my mouth With his tongue  I thought it was as HackerJacket says...lol I just wrote Hacker jacket  How about underloading I want my v64 break to be v1 plz |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 11:57:31 AM by Alpha-9 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
